<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Google&#8217;s real time and latest results REALLY based on relevance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonyadam.com/blog/496-googles-real-time-latest-results-relevance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonyadam.com/blog/496-googles-real-time-latest-results-relevance/</link>
	<description>Creating Visibility through Virality, Buzz Marketing, and SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:21:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yosef Solomon</title>
		<link>http://tonyadam.com/blog/496-googles-real-time-latest-results-relevance/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>Yosef Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyadam.com/blog/?p=496#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty cool, but I&#039;m still wondering why you didn&#039;t get any clicks from Google on the kindle tweet... Did they just record them as incoming twitter clicks? 
 
As for real-time search, I think once Google is able to figure out which tweets matter most, it&#039;ll be most more useful. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s pretty cool, but I&#039;m still wondering why you didn&#039;t get any clicks from Google on the kindle tweet&#8230; Did they just record them as incoming twitter clicks? </p>
<p>As for real-time search, I think once Google is able to figure out which tweets matter most, it&#039;ll be most more useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @thursdaisy</title>
		<link>http://tonyadam.com/blog/496-googles-real-time-latest-results-relevance/comment-page-1/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>@thursdaisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyadam.com/blog/?p=496#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>I agree with you (per my screen shot below). I think it&#039;s going to be very lucrative market for spammers to start putting trash into Google real time search results. I hope Google implements existing or creates new methods to fight against irrelevancy in their real time search results. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4329587444_8d66f4cf41_b.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4329587444_8d...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you (per my screen shot below). I think it&#039;s going to be very lucrative market for spammers to start putting trash into Google real time search results. I hope Google implements existing or creates new methods to fight against irrelevancy in their real time search results. </p>
<p><a href="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4329587444_8d66f4cf41_b.jpg" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4329587444_8d.." rel="nofollow">http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4329587444_8d..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
